Blog post

Will UK floods bring an end to climate silence?

Feb 17, 2014 by | 1 Comment

The wet­test January in the UK in 250 years fol­lowed by a stormy February have brought misery to many thou­sands. Floods have sub­merged large chunks of the south-west of the country, a key stretch of railway col­lapsed into the sea, and the river Thames spec­tac­u­larly burst its banks, delu­ging towns and villages.

As a state­ment from the UK’s weather ser­vice, the Met Office, made clear, these are the sorts of events that are made more likely by cli­mate change. But a strange dis­con­nect has run through main­stream media cov­erage and polit­ical dis­course. Amid the clamour to appor­tion blame and polit­ical point-scoring, one con­ver­sa­tion was con­spicu­ously low pro­file: whether this is a bitter taste of what cli­mate change has in store for the UK.

For a long time, social sci­ent­ists have been inter­ested in the impact of flooding and other extreme weather on public atti­tudes to cli­mate change. Because it is regarded as a dis­tant and intan­gible threat to people across much of Europe – not here, not now and not us – com­mu­nic­ating its risks has proved to be a sig­ni­ficant chal­lenge. Intuition would sug­gest that per­sonal exper­i­ence of the sorts of events asso­ci­ated with cli­mate change would cut through the psy­cho­lo­gical security blanket that usu­ally keeps the issue at arm’s length. And sure enough, research has found a link between being flooded and elev­ated con­cern about cli­mate change.

In a study pub­lished in 2011 (Nature Climate Change,, people who had been flooded expressed not only higher levels of cli­mate con­cern but a greater will­ing­ness to reduce their carbon foot­prints. In another more recent survey of Welsh cit­izens, those living in a recently flooded area were 10 per cent more likely to agree that the impact of cli­mate change is already being felt.

Sudden and extreme events like flooding are a grim reminder that the cli­mate is chan­ging. But even mundane changes can play a role in shaping opinion. An ana­lysis of US views over two dec­ades found a clear and con­sistent rela­tion­ship between average tem­per­at­ures and belief in the reality and ser­i­ous­ness of cli­mate change. The study even put a figure on this: for every degree that tem­per­ature rose above the average over the pre­vious 12 months, there was a 7.6 per cent increase in agree­ment that the world was warming.

So will the 2014 floods cata­lyse a dra­matic reduc­tion in public apathy to cli­mate change? A new study led by my col­league Stuart Capstick sug­gests that some people will be unmoved – because weather pat­terns are inter­preted according to existing beliefs and values. The research focused on per­cep­tions of cli­mate change during a cold snap that engulfed the UK in 2011, ana­lysing responses according to polit­ical views and values.

Those who were more indi­vidu­al­istic and endorsed free-market eco­nomic prin­ciples were more likely to be cli­mate scep­tics, and this group saw the freezing tem­per­at­ures as evid­ence that the world was not warming. But three times as many people viewed the dis­ruptive, chaotic weather as proof of a chan­ging climate.

Extreme weather, like every aspect of the highly polar­ised topic of cli­mate change, is thus sub­ject to powerful psy­cho­lo­gical, cul­tural and polit­ical fil­ters, which con­spire to pro­duce con­founding out­comes. The Daily Mail – a news­paper renowned for its scep­tical edit­or­ials and reporting – responded to the floods in a pre­dict­able manner. Rather than cri­ti­cise the gov­ern­ment for failing to invest in cli­mate change adapt­a­tion, the paper picked a familiar vil­lain – the over­seas aid budget – and argued that it should be redeployed to help flood victims.

As much as cli­mate change is a sci­entific issue, the stories we read about it are important too.

Scientists are under­stand­ably reluctant to make causal links between any single weather event and the com­plex dynamics of a chan­ging cli­mate. Definitive proof that this weather is the result of cli­mate change is cur­rently beyond us. But without a coordin­ated and con­sistent mes­sage that more flooding is on the way for the UK if ambi­tious action on cli­mate change is not forth­coming, there is no guar­antee that the public will join the dots. In the absence of a coherent nar­rative on this, uncer­tainty flour­ishes and scep­ti­cism is likely to grow.

The soci­olo­gist Robert Brulle tracked US public opinion on cli­mate change over more than a decade, piecing together events and influ­ences that had swayed views. Brulle’s ana­lysis pointed strongly to the import­ance of “elite cues”; that is, sig­nals and mes­sages that people get from the media, politi­cians and other high-profile voices. What they say mat­ters – espe­cially when they say nothing.

Unsurprisingly, with such a muted national con­ver­sa­tion in the UK, public interest has dwindled. A cli­mate silence prevails.

A report I wrote for the Climate Outreach and Information Network at the end of last year argued that the cli­mate change debate urgently needs new nar­rat­ives that make the link between the cli­mate chal­lenge and ordinary people. Climate change will have an impact on most aspects of society, yet it remains stuck in an envir­on­ment­alist niche, as if only greens needed to con­cern them­selves with the effects of a warmer world.

In flooded Oxford, res­id­ents held a demon­stra­tion that posed a simple ques­tion: can we talk about cli­mate change now? Belatedly – and after thou­sands of homes have been dam­aged by floods – the issue of cli­mate change is gradu­ally re-entering the national dis­course. It may be the only silver lining in an oth­er­wise thor­oughly grue­some winter’s tale.

Originally pub­lished by the New Scientist magazine 14.02.14

1 Comment + Add Comment

Make a comment

Creative Commons 2011 - 2015, Talking Climate
A project by COIN & PIRC.
This website is a project of Climate Outreach

This website, a project of Climate Outreach (COIN), has been integrated into the new Climate Outreach website. Any updates since 21 October 2015 have been made to the new website only, not here, and this website will soon be deleted. Please bookmark our new website – we look forward to continuing to share the latest in climate communication research with you. We are now tweeting from @climateoutreach so please follow us there.